So this is my ‘do-d’ list, an attempt to respond to the comment "what can I say?!”
· Do talk about the size of disabled population, stressing vast numbers, huge inequality, lack of visibility and wide variation. This helps contradict the assumption that disabled individuals are few and a separate group to those individuals facing sexism, racism, homophobia, religious intolerance, family and partners choices.
· Do highlight the disadvantage and inequality imposed on disabled people. Articulate identity separately, because respecting choice in no way stops us from talking about discrimination.
· Do make the assumption that to be visible at all most disabled people have no-doubt overcome huge barriers, simply to achieve life goals many others can take for granted.
· Do refer to D/deaf and Disabled People’s Organisations as the go-to for self-representation. Individual experience is the first step, but D/deaf and Disabled People’s Organisations offer a shared voice that adds activism and community interests to accountable storytelling.
· Do refer to the societal and environmental aspects of disability discrimination in exactly the same way as you would frame a conversation about anti-racism or anti-sexism.
· Do state clearly that organisational culture, and more broadly society, denies many individuals their human right to belong, which is a cost to communities.
· Do ask about identity, if and when a professional relationship has been established. Disabled individuals will have different words for their experience, knowledge and wisdom on these issues. As do feminists, for example. Allow for this choice and respect personal boundaries. Illness, impairment and difference, contrary to society’s storytelling, are private matters.
Read more - Legitimacy, accountability and human rights
No comments:
Post a Comment